your universe Universe the411 the Daily News Blogs

Letter: "Devoting" deficient

While the author of the viewpoint “Devoting” (Oct. 1) makes some valid points about possible improvements to the devotional program, he is grossly misinformed about the availability of BYU devotionals (after the fact) for those who couldn’t attend.

I would direct him and any others who aren’t aware to byub.org. This is the BYU broadcasting Web site (I have it bookmarked on my computer right below the church’s Web site).

On this site you will find a very functional archive of past devotionals and forums.
These are usually found in multiple formats, including .pdf transcripts, video files and mp3’s, which can be downloaded to your iTunes or Windows Media Player and listened to at your leisure.

I have several past devotionals that I keep as CD’s in my car to listen to on long drives.

Letter: Front-page football fetish

A newspaper is occasionally justified in featuring an exceptional business, family life or sports story on its front page, where national and international news belongs.

At The Daily Universe, however, the criterion for a front-page story is this: barring some national or campus-wide catastrophe, football is always first, and a football story ideally fills up three-quarters of the front page, accompanied by half a dozen photos.

I’m not against, nor would the Deseret News or the Salt Lake Tribune be against, a front-page article for, say, BYU’s win over top-ranked Oklahoma. And since The Daily Universe is a campus-wide student newspaper, it’s even acceptable that wins against Tulane and Colorado State (and a loss to Florida State, for that matter) receive front-page treatment.

Letter: Scheduling conflicts

I am sure there is some lame excuse (such as TV contracts) for why BYU athletics chose to schedule a home football game during the General Relief Society broadcast last Saturday. But I am equally as sure that this excuse would not be used to schedule a game during general priesthood meeting.

Why the double standard? It is easy to talk about respecting the spiritual lives of women. It is much harder to show that respect. Perhaps those making these decisions should read September’s First Presidency message: “The Influence of Righteous Women” by President Dieter F. Uchtdorf. But reading about respect is not enough; they need to act accordingly.

Sven E. Wilson
Political Science Department
 

Viewpoint: Devoting - Changes needed to make devotional more successful

By MICHAEL CHIDESTER

In appraising the effectiveness of any program, two questions must, at a minimum, be addressed. First, what was the organizers’ intent, stated or otherwise, for the program? Second, how well was this intent achieved? Other considerations might also be included, such as planning, expense, logistics, and so forth, but these two questions are paramount.

The intent behind the devotional program is not stated anywhere on the BYU site that I can find. I’m going to assume, therefore, that President Cecil O. Samuelson’s intent in the devotional program is something along the lines of “that uplifting and educational material is offered, that it is made available to as many BYU students and personnel as possible, and that students are encouraged to attend and participate.”

Video: On The Street — Devotionals and Forums

Letter: 19 at BYU

In response to “Follow the Prophet:” I'm a 19-year-old sophomore at BYU. There are many people at BYU who would judge me for not serving a mission. However, that is something that’s between me and the Lord.

It’s not for everyone else to decide who I am and what kind of a person I am on the basis that I haven’t served a mission. Others can’t understand the circumstances of my life at all. Every day, I feel like people are judging me and thinking I'm a sinner just because I'm 19 and attend BYU. One of my roommates always says, "Don't judge me. That's for God to decide." While he says it jokingly, it's quite true. People who judge others without knowing their circumstances is one of the biggest peeves I have about the BYU community.

Letter: Make an informed decision

My father has served as a bishop in several wards, helped numerous young men mature in the gospel as scoutmaster and raised six children, all of whom are strong in the gospel. But according to “Follow the prophet” (Sept. 24), he shouldn’t even have had the chance to be married because he did not serve a mission.

This condemnation on men who do not serve is inexcusable. Should young men be forced to choose between serving a mission and being ostracized?  Besides being a horrible reason for becoming a missionary, young men actually do have the agency to choose whether to serve or not. Now, the majority of RMs are extraordinary men who return to live exemplary lives, but young men should not be discarded simply because they do not serve.

Letter: What about now?

I am really surprised by the comments that have been written in response to "Mission doesn't make the man" (Sept. 22). 

All members of this church have to realize that it is "obedience that makes the man," but also that "all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23)No one is eligible for an eternal marriage without the atonement.  Not even an RM.

For young men approaching the age to serve: do everything in your power to serve a full time mission.  The experience you will gain from this will be invaluable to you.  Also, it is a commandment.  Keep the commandments.

Letter: Deal breakers

It is a simple fact that most girls would not date a guy shorter than them.  For whatever reason, height is frequently a "deal-breaker" in a relationship.  However, there is no law mandating this. Similar deal-breakers exist throughout dating—things we cannot overcome in forming a relationship. Recently in The Daily Universe, the question had been raised of whether or not serving a mission should be a "deal-breaker."

Letter: Don't judge

To lump people into categories of righteousness based on “RM” or “non-RM” status is not only naïve, but highly destructive. You would hope that when an individual is ready to become engaged, they would know the other person on a fairly deep level. I assume they have a fairly good grasp on each other's character that goes far beyond categories of serving a mission or not. I think missions are vastly important. I am eternally grateful to the missionaries who brought the gospel to me and my family. I have a great respect for those who have chosen to make such a difficult sacrifice. It is not my place, however, to hold anything against an individual who hasn’t served a mission. I know several fantastic and incredibly spiritual individuals who haven’t served missions. It is terrible that anyone would judge them or look down on them because of that.

Letter: Shaky ground

When it comes to marriage and dating, the safest ground in any relationship is to date/marry those who are committed to following the prophet.

Letter: A matter of value

Since when is it an act of snobbery to date only individuals who share your deeply held values?  The “Mission doesn’t make the man” and “Think twice” letters both implied that girls who date only returned missionaries are somehow being close-minded and hyper-judgemental.  But, assuming that these girls are dating with the intent to get married, they’re just making a very sensible choice.  For a marriage to be strong and happy, couples really need to be on the same page as far as their deep, personal values are concerned.  Most girls realize this, and will try to date guys who share their perspective on spiritual matters.  If a girl looking for a future husband finds out that a guy hasn’t served a mission, the question isn’t whether or not he’s a basically  “good person.”  The real question is &ldq

Letter: RM irony

To the authors of, “Obedience makes men” and “Follow the prophet,” I found the irony of your statements terribly sickening. Both of you attacked the integrity of those who for whatever reason chose not to serve missions, even as far as calling those who didn’t feel like they grew from their missions “pathetic.” My friends, you obviously didn’t learn very much from your missions if you continue to judge your fellow men from past mistakes that they have made.

Letter: Look at the heart

We all know that the Prophet has requested that every worthy young man serve a mission, but sometimes people make mistakes or things happen in their lives that make it so they do not serve missions.  I have a father, who by the way is a bishop, who did not serve a mission. 

Letter: Can’t we all just get along?

This whole discussion about missions is ridiculous. Serving a mission is a commandment, and if a young man is worthy and able, he should go.  However, if he doesn’t, others shouldn’t judge him for not doing so. I think it’s silly for someone to leave BYU because they feel “discriminated” against for not serving a mission. Personally, I think some of these people are probably too picky themselves and when a few girls they are attracted to reject them, they give up.  Sorry to say it, but not everyone is going to like you, regardless of if you are an RM or not.

There are plenty of RMs that I wouldn’t want to date, and there are plenty of non-RMs that I would date.