your universe Universe the411 the Daily News Blogs

Viewpoint: A precious hour

By Kirsten Thompson

 

A recent Daily Universe viewpoint criticizing university devotionals and forums was replete with errors and assumptions that even the author confessed might be “wildly inaccurate.” He is correct; they were. In the spirit of helpfulness, I thought I should share the facts that the previous article should have included.

Video: On The Street — BYU Facial hair policy


Letter: Hyde Park

Caitlin Bronson’s article (Oct. 6.) on a new gun bill being sponsored by Illinois Rep. Bobby Rush mentions that his district includes the “notorious Hyde Park” neighborhood.

If she is referring to crime and shootings, then Hyde Park is anything but notorious. It is one of Chicago’s safer neighborhoods and is known for being the city’s most successfully integrated neighborhood and a hub of academia. It is home to the University of Chicago, the city’s Museum of Science and Industry and, formerly, President Barack Obama.

Letter: Special ’staches

Why are mustaches the only facial hair allowed? It seems like one of those outdated aspects of the Honor Code that they haven’t revised since the 1970s — like how flip flops used to be banned

Why not beards? If anything, beards are better than mustaches. Mustaches, for me anyway, always bring to mind creepy molesters or dweebs like Kip from “Napoleon Dynamite.” The only people in the history of the world to ever pull off a mustache are 1) Clark Gable 2) Errol Flynn 3) Howard Keel (you may know him as Adam from “Seven Brides for Seven Brothers”) and 4) The original Brawny paper towel man. Only four people.

Mustaches are drowning in negative stigma but a beard will always be iconic. What would Santa Claus be without his beard? Or members of ZZ Top?

Letter: Priorities

In response to the author of “Scheduling Conflicts” (Oct. 6), may I remind them that the football game is not rescheduled simply for the priesthood session, but for General Conference weekend as a whole. In addition, all of the players, coaches, etc. attend/play in the games, whereas females comprise only a portion of the fan base.

Furthermore, is a football game really where true priorities lie? Is it going to utterly destroy your life as you know it if you were to miss a football game? Lastly, the Relief Society broadcast was broadcast twice, Saturday and Sunday, and was available to watch online as soon as the broadcast ended. It’s time to stop crying out to others about disrespect and get over yourself.

 Lindsey Hodges
Oldsmar, Fla.
 

Letter: Hail the mustache

In regard to the article about mustaches (Oct. 6), I would like every guy to know that not all women “rally against it.” Among the very elect, women would agree that a mustache makes a man more dignified and attractive. Look at men like Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt and the Mario Brothers, sporting the beautiful ’stache. In addition, consider the textbook cases of good-looking guys all over campus who embrace the small amount of facial hair that they by right may have.

A man that chooses to grow a mustache is one that is confident, self-assured and powerful — he is his own man. Many mustached men feel oppressed and unfairly judged because of their facial hair. I am here to tell you men that you do not stand alone; there are many women out there who support you.

Letter: Decoration discretion

I have noticed many “cute” Halloween decorations being put up around campus. It takes no imagination or knowledge of paganism/witchcraft to see the holiday’s clear roots. Other holidays are much more cryptic in the origins of their symbolism, but at least they have some ties to Christianity; not so with Halloween. However, I started to think more about Halloween when I came across a quote from “Power of the Witch” by Lori Cabot, founder of the Witches’ League for Public Awareness:

Letter: Virtues of the ’stache

Your article about mustaches was very informative and enjoyable. I have always felt that mustaches were very fashionable and stylish and that by wearing a mustache, you set yourself apart as someone who is not only a friendly person, but also a person of great wisdom.

Also, any girl that doesn’t like mustaches is just jealous. I have tried to grow a mustache in the past but have been somewhat disappointed in my ability to grow a thick mustache. However, after reading your article, I feel inspired to try again. Thank you again for your beautiful article.

Greg Murray
Auburn, Calif.
 
 

Letter: Guns kill

Recently, The Daily Universe posted an opinion piece about H.R. 45, which seeks to toughen gun licensing laws. The author spends five paragraphs explaining that the new law will deal with people, not guns, and then falsely states that the bill focuses on “the instruments of crime” instead of the criminals.

I understand submitting a picture and thumbprint is a lot for us Americans as we have an innate sense of entitlement, but the new laws are needed to curb many violent acts. I suppose the author is upset you have to take a test before being able to drive.

The article also states that gun laws have done nothing to stop crime from increasing. America has more gun deaths a year than other countries with very strict gun laws. This new bill would have helped save the victims of Columbine because the killers obtained a legally purchased gun. This bill would have saved many lives taken in domestic disputes by people who purchased their gun legally.

Letter: Mustache mystery

I just wanted to point out the incredibly hilarious quote from Tuesday’s Daily Universe. Steve Baker, the director of the Honor Code Office, speaks on facial hair, and his response is beyond classic: “There is nothing that I’m aware of that lends itself to an explanation. I would suggest that you live the standards and do it on your own initiative because you’ve given your word that you would live it.”

It’s a sad day when people give rules and don’t have to explain them — just pull the “you promised, now do it” card. All I can think of when I read this is the novel “1984,” where the leaders impose whatever they want on the people and when questioned, refuse to explain their reasoning. Here we have the leader of the Honor Code Office, in an interview with the paper that represents the entire student population, blatantly refusing to explain the rules he put in place. Something is wrong here.

Letter: “Devo” discrepancies

Regarding Michael Chidester’s viewpoint “Devoting” (Oct. 1), I have several points to make.

1) I feel that an ill-informed viewpoint in The Daily Universe is a presumptive and inappropriate forum to chastise President Cecil O. Samuelson and those who organize and present the university’s devotionals.

2) Non-essential services are closed to provide nearly all of the campus community the opportunity to decide to participate in the devotionals. A large number of faculty, staff and students would not have this choice if these services were not closed.

Letter: Listen and act

President Thomas S. Monson discussed service in conference; how perfect for BYU.

Two weeks ago my sister came on campus with her two children to pick something up. Upon return, she discovered her car battery had died. She popped the hood and stood by her car, holding jumper cables. She asked three different people for help and each gave some excuse why they couldn’t. The BYU police stopped by and referred her to the BYU Auto Club, which charges $10 a jump. After 30 minutes, my sister called my other sister, who dropped everything to come and take 90 seconds to help.

Letter: False figures

I was disappointed in The Daily Universe’s coverage of Sutherland Institute’s Sacred Ground event held at the Provo Tabernacle on Sept. 24. Though no one else seems to have noticed or cared, the article “Sutherland Institute conference draws supporters, protests” erroneously made it seem as if there were as many homosexual protesters outside the tabernacle as there were traditional marriage supporters inside. There were more quotes from the protesters and only a brief description of the discussions happening inside.

Letter: "Devoting" problems

There were a number of problems with the Oct. 1 viewpoint (“Devoting”).  First, someone who attends only “two or three” devotionals per semester is not qualified to offer a critique. Second, the author based his evaluation on his own guess as to what the “intent” of devotionals is. A visit to the library and a little research — beyond a perusal of the BYU Web site — would have been a good idea. Third, there are problems with the assumptions upon which the author bases his arguments.

Whether a devotional is uplifting depends largely on the preparation of the listener. When I leave a devotional feeling less than uplifted, it is likely because I didn’t prepare myself.

Letter: The honorable Simpsons

Why don’t people like “The Simpsons?” My question may seem dated, but I can’t help but notice that BYU promotes “The Office” on its Web site — a show with crude subject matter beyond that of “The Simpsons.”

Yesterday, I was in the Bookstore and noticed that “The Simpsons” was nowhere to be found in the “DVD on TV” section but you can find shows like “Scrubs,” which has much more instances of casual sex and crude humor than are present on any episode of “The Simpsons.” (As far as I can remember, no main character in “The Simpsons” ever breaks marital vows.)
I wonder then what is so offensive about an episode of “The Simpsons?” Why were so many people not allowed to watch it growing up?  My wife thinks it was how it was marketed; I think that most of these people have never watched an episode to see its strong moral messages.