As the BYU football team gets ready to take on TCU in what might be this year’s premier Mountain West Conference matchup, fans have to be feeling a bit confused about the offensive and defensive units.
Despite an explosion against Tulane, the offense spent the first five games of the season largely out-of-sync. The team was scoring and the chains were moving, but the heralded BYU passing attack, which contributed 10 touchdowns but also 11 interceptions, seemed inconsistent and possibly even unreliable.
The defense, on the other hand, was a force to be reckoned with through the first few games. After a spirited performance against Oklahoma, holding the Sooners to 13 points (Oklahoma averaged 51 points per game in 2008), the BYU defense shut down Tulane on the road, allowing three points and 162 total yards.
But the tide has shifted.
The offense is dominating opponents again. BYU has averaged 49.5 points in its last two games – in that time, previously struggling QB Max Hall is 48 for 66, throwing for 666 yards and 5 TDs with, yes, no interceptions. Hall even channeled his inner Tim Tebow this past Saturday, rushing for 47 yards and a score on 14 attempts.
The defense, well, has regressed. The Cougars haven’t been able to hold an opponent to under 17 points since the second game of the season, allowing an average of 28.6 points in that five-game span. Fans are starting to see the parallels to last year’s defense, which also featured early defensive statements (UCLA and Wyoming) but then began to regress with the loss at TCU, giving up an average of 32 points in the final seven games of the season.
The offense is clicking yet again, but a defense that impressed so many early in the season might be on the decline.
The defensive pass rush is taking too much time to apply pressure in the backfield, giving quarterbacks too much time to scan the field and make a play. Any decent college quarterback worth his scholarship can make a throw when he has all day – only the best can make a play in the face of defensive pressure.
For the third consecutive week, BYU’s 89th-ranked defense allowed a pass completion over 30 yards, something the unit hadn’t done through the first four games. The team allowed its second 100-yard receiver in as many games when SDSU’s Vincent Brown caught 8 passes for 147 yards, the third receiver to accomplish that feat against BYU this season.
Yet even after a surge of big plays from SDSU on Saturday, it never really felt like BYU was in trouble. The team is second only to Florida in passing efficiency and boasts a stout 23rd-ranked run defense that is only bested by TCU in the MWC. If the offense can keep you in any game and the defense can prevent an opponent from running out the clock, what’s the problem?
The problem is that big plays will kill any good team, as will opponents converting crucial third downs. You can survive these mistakes against SDSU, but experienced and talented teams like TCU and Utah feast on those errors.
Fans might remember the number that FSU’s Christian Ponder did to the Cougars in Provo. The quarterback sat in the pocket for several seconds before a hole formed in front of him, allowing Ponder opportunities to rush 11 times for 77 yards. Four of these rushes occurred on third down, resulting in three drive-extending first downs and one touchdown. BYU wasn’t able to get rushers to Ponder quick enough, and couldn’t seal the deal when they were able to get there.
FSU’s very next game against South Florida was completely different. One designed quarterback draw in the first half resulted in a loss for Ponder, as the South Florida defense was on him seemingly as the ball was snapped – I timed the play and have the pressure arriving in 1.64 seconds. On a first and goal for FSU in the third quarter, Ponder dropped back to pass, was forced to escape the pocket within 1.89 seconds, and was eventually brought down in 3.26 seconds.
On each of these plays, South Florida sent five players to the quarterback, attacking the gaps and relentlessly pursuing Ponder just one week after he set up a campsite in his pocket at LaVell Edwards Stadium.
With 6:29 left in the first quarter in San Diego, the Cougars sent a four-man rush at quarterback Ryan Lindley, who promptly scanned the field for 2.85 seconds before throwing a 45-yard bomb to Vincent Brown. The one-on-one coverage wasn’t bad by any means, but Brown had an extra split-second to separate himself from the BYU defender and make a play. On a 3rd and 27 in the third quarter, the Cougars lined up four and dropped one into coverage, giving Lindley 3.43 seconds against the three-man rush to throw a touchdown pass and tie the game at 21.
In his book “Football: Winning Defense,” hall of fame coach Bud Wilkinson lays out four ways to create long-yardage situations if the secondary is playing error-free football. The first three: penalties, ball-handling errors and offensive assignment errors. These are always helpful to a defense but shouldn’t be relied upon. The fourth suggestion on Wilkinson’s list is the most important because it can be controlled by the defense regardless of what the offense does: “a well-executed defensive maneuver by the linemen and linebackers resulting in a loss of yardage on the play.”
It’s time for the front-seven to step it up. Nobody who watches BYU football can doubt the heart and effort of the defensive line and linebackers, but effort only makes half the play. The defensive unit is talented enough and is now deep enough that defensive game plans should play to the strengths of the personnel: strong gap stuffers up front and quick playmakers in back, just like a 3-4 scheme is supposed to be.
Almost every successful 3-4 scheme in college and in the NFL is able to pressure the quarterback by securing the A and B gaps with the front three while a couple of speedy linebackers beat the offensive tackles by coming off the edges. There are numerous permutations, but a well-executed scheme featuring rushes of five or more has a much better chance of forcing an early pass and protecting the secondary.
This weekend’s matchup pits the BYU defense against a unit that is ranked 11th in rushing offense and 22nd in total offense. The focus will and should be on stopping the run, but I’m sure the defense doesn’t want to spend a fourth week giving up big pass plays. Not to a team this good.
As the great Bud Wilkinson wrote, put the front seven in a position to make plays. One “well-executed defensive maneuver” might be the difference between an epic homecoming victory and a bitter conference defeat.






Feeds   
You are dead on Cueva. I like your insights.
With FSU and subsequent opponents, it has been painfully obvious that the defensive front has failed to consistently get pressure on opposing QBs. If adjustments are being made, they are certainly not obvious because the results are still the same. The secondary continues to get lit up.
I fear more of the same is in store this Saturday.
I for most agree with your article. As A BYU fan I want BYU to win this game, but when I think of our defense not just the secondary (slow and undersized) but the front seven as well (slow against option QBs, huge holes, not enough pressure), I think is going to be along day not just for the players but for the fans as well. And the offense play well mostly only against week or average teams (I know many of my cofans are going to get mad at me, but is true), but TCU is a very atlhetic defensive team, they will be on Hall as soon as he gets the ball, and if gets to throw the ball they will be overjumping our recievers in the air to intercep it. Our coaching stuff is also slow in making adjustments (if they make any at all), I hate to see Bronco down there calmed and not saying anything to the players or the coaching stuff when we are losing, probably he is thinking what to say once the game is over but by then is too late. Anyways As BYU fan I'm goimg t cheer for my team and hopefully they will prove me wrong.
GO COUGARS
Your comments are spot on. Getting no pressure on the opposing quarterback makes them look like All-stars against us and then chumps when they play teams who can get pressure.
Also, the students at BYU right now never watched Steve Young play in college and most likely not while he was in the NFL. I don't see any problem using a comparison with Tim Tebow.
Everyone who knows anything about football knows that you need to put pressure on the QB. You cant give a QB time to pick apart your defense. Unfortunately the bend but don't break philosophy has held our front back and has added even more responsibility to our secondary. I am convinced that until we change our philosophy we will struggle against teams that know how to take advantage of our zone coverages. Here is for BYU being aggressive again!
'Bend don't break' counts on the opponent making errors while attempting to execute multiple plays during long drives. Early in the season, opponents make more errors and the defense looks pretty good. Over the course of a season opponents fix their errors, and the defense is less effective. Year to year our opponents also perfect their execution. FSU's offense made almost no errors. At some point, BYU needs to change their defensive philosophy or they just won't be as competitive.
That is a very good observation which I have not considered before. Let's just hope that the pumped-up-prepared team we saw against Oklahoma finds itself again this Saturday.
Interesting article, I guess you are entitled to your opinion. However, I had to discredit it after I read that Hall "channeled his inner Tim Tebow". There are many legendary quarterbacks that have played for BYU, why not choose one of them?
Go Cougars!!!
10 interceptions, not 11. As far as the defense, I think most fans don't find themselves confused nor dissatisfied. After 7 games this season, 6 quarters of mediocre or poor defense shouldn't be what defines this unit. This article did a little too much reaching to make a weak point.
No, I think it's legit. BYU hasn't really been successful with the pass rush this season. Their defense is OK enough to give us wins over the lower tier, but not against the upper tier. And I think that any fan would agree that it's confusing that the defense was so stout against OU (a perennial top 5 team), but didn't show the same thing against SDSU (a regular bottom 10 team).